07/19/15 



Statistical Literacy (1979) by Dennis G. Haack Preface: Extract: All teachers of statistics courses are doubtless aware of the negative attitude students often have toward learning about statistics. Further, most of us have wondered where this problem of attitude arises — with the teacher, the learner, or the course itself. Many teachers feel that students don’t know what’s best. Statistics is a bitter pill that must be taken for the student’s own wellbeing. The same teachers often feel that the students will later look back on their elementary statistics course and realize that it was indeed valuable. But does the problem really lie with the teacher or with the type of initial statistics course we give students? Few who teach statistics courses are data analysts; yet this is the course we try to teach. Using Greek and other mathematical symbols that few students understand we try to teach students data manipulation. In addition, we try to teach students when and how to use techniques such as a ttest; yet it is doubtful that any of them will ever have a need to analyze data using such a test, and it is just as doubtful that those who will have to run a ttest will do so properly. Is it necessary for a first course in statistics to teach data manipulation, or would we do better to emphasize the interpretation of statistics? In order to answer this question, let us first decide how students are likely to come in contact with statistics. Rather than designing an experiment and collecting and analyzing the data, students are more likely to read the results of an experiment and need to interpret those results. Some students may never read research reports, but all will be exposed to newspapers, magazines, radio, and television. Through the media everyone comes in contact with statistics each day. Statistics is more a language in this regard than a research tool. This language is often misused, giving our profession a bad name. 1 Misuse of the language of statistics is statistical doublespeak. Why don’t we teach students how to understand statistics as a language so they can detect the statistical doublespeak they encounter in the media as well as in their fields of study? This book and the course for which it is designed have this very objective: to teach students how to interpret statistics so they can detect statistical doublespeak in the media and in their fields of study. If we decide that a first course in statistics should emphasize the interpretation of statistics, what adjustments can be made in the usual course? First, symbolic formulas are not as necessary. Students are to be concerned with what a statistic means, not how to calculate the statistic. Many statisticians agree that the amount of formulation in elementary statistics courses need to be reduced. It is revolutionary, however, to eliminate all formulas. Many feel that this is a drastic step – and it is! But I have found that students accept it enthusiastically. [Click on Preface link above for the remainder]
Editorial comment: "Doublespeak" is not in Orwell's 1984, but it
combines "Newspeak" and "Doubletalk." OTHER ARTICLES by Dennis Haack: 1976: "A Nonsymbolic Statistics Course" in Communications in Statistics, Methods and Techniques. Abstract: "A new statistics course is being taught at the University of Kentucky which does not require students to learn the symbolic language of statistics (the formulas). Students who will never take a traditional “methods” course in statistics learn to become better consumers of statistic fed them daily by the different news media. Other students who realize that much statistics await them in graduate school see this course as a good starting point." Extract: "Testing in such a course is quite difficult but I have found that something other than the project is needed to evaluate students." 1979: "Teaching Statistical Literacy" in Teaching Statistics, Vol. 1.3, pp 7476. Abstract: "More people have to read and understand others’ statistics than have to carry out their own statistical research. A first course in statistics should therefore concentrate on statistics as a language." Extract: "A first course in statistics should teach statistics as a language rather than as a research tool. Emphasis should be on interpreting statistics rather than on calculating statistics." 1980: "A Note on Teaching Statistical Literacy" in Teaching Statistics, Vol. 2.1, pp 2223. Abstract: "In his previous article Dennis Haack discussed the philosophy behind his course in teaching statistics as a language. Here he looks at some ways of assessing students taking such a course." Excerpt: "Grading students is always a problem—more so it seems with an interpretive approach to teaching statistics. Three sources of information are being used in arriving at a student’s grade in the course I am presently teaching.
1980: "Statistical Doublespeak" Quarterly Review of Doublespeak, Volume VII #1, October 1980. Extract: "Statistical doublespeak is particularly effective since statistical statements are not likely to be scrutinized." 1981: "Statistical Doublespeak II: Methods of Contact and Response Rates of Surveys" Quarterly Review of Doublespeak, Vol. VII #2 January 1981. Extract: "the key to successful polling, and hence to our evaluation of the results, is that as many of the selected individuals as possible be interviewed. The response rate, the percent of selected people actually interviewed, is a key indicator of survey quality, yet it is a bit of information seldom divulged by a pollster." 1981: "Statistical Doublespeak III: Survey Size and Timing" Quarterly Review of Doublespeak, Vol. VII #3 April 1981. Extracts: "Our intuition regarding sample size can create problems if we are not careful. First, size is not the most important aspect of a sample. How potential respondents are selected is more important than size." "The timing of interviews is another important consideration in interpreting survey results." "Timing is an issue because public opinion is ever changing. Some changes arc predictable and can be taken into account as we read the results of a survey." 1981: "Statistical Doublespeak IV: Sample Design and Selection" Quarterly Review of Doublespeak, Vol. VII #4 July 1981. Extracts: "If you have followed our discussions, and thought about the different national surveys which are run, you should have come to the conclusion that most national surveys are not very accurate measures of public opinion." 1981: "Teaching Statistical Literacy to Nurses" ASA Proceedings of the Section on Statistical Education, 101102. 
This site was last updated 06/02/13